But the first season of Game Of Thrones was also remarkably faithful to George R.R. Three hours in, and it truly seems like Moore is committed to providing Outlander fans with a remarkably faithful recreation of the novel. While not taken from Gabaldon's words, this invention works wonderfully in increasing the tension between these two characters. Naturally, it turned out Claire was right and she managed to cure the boy with belladonna. He thought the boy was possessed by demons, she thought he'd been poisoned by lily of the valley. The only significant plot point so far that was wholly invented for the TV show was Claire's collision with Father Bain over the treatment of a sick young boy. ("Claire Beauchamp Randall, promise you'll return to me." *swoon*) These help us see Claire and Frank as a real couple, which makes the love triangle more complicated. ![]() While the books take place entirely inside Claire's head, the TV version takes time to show us Frank searching for his missing wife and to provide us with flashbacks to their marriage - like when they were first separated by WWII. But hooray for progressive depictions of female pleasure in pop culture!Ī few more changes were evident in the show's second and third episodes. This is an interesting addition because in the books, it's made explicit that Frank had never done that for her. Another minor change is a sex scene where Frank goes down on Claire. We see her as she treats a soldier's mangled leg and then watches the troops celebrate the end of the war. Instead of beginning in the midst of Claire's second honeymoon with her husband Frank, we're treated to a flashback only alluded to in the novels: Claire's work as a nurse during WWII. The only major change is Outlander's opening scene. Moore doesn't even add any cool special effects for Claire's trip through time - as in the book, she simply likens the sensation to a car crash and then wakes up on the ground. The first episode follows events of Gabaldon's book almost beat-for-beat. So what is different? Not much, actually. (She's also a costume designer on the show.) ![]() And there's a pretty simple explanation for why Moore has been so uncharacteristically loyal to the source material this time around: according to Vulture, he was introduced to Outlander by his wife Terry Dresbach, a huge Gabaldon fan who refuses to allow him to mangle her favorite books. In its first three episodes, the Starz series has been remarkably faithful to Gabaldon's words - no gender-swapping of characters, no darker tone, no addition of religious subtext. Some fans were concerned by Moore's involvement: Would he change Outlander as much as he changed Galactica? Those fans can now breathe a sigh of relief. While that show is widely considered a crowning achievement of science-fiction on television, it was a complete re-imagining and re-hauling of its source material, a 1978 TV series of the same name. Moore, most popularly known as the man behind Battlestar Galactica. The sixteen-episode series currently airing on Starz was created by Ronald D. While fans of the book were excited to finally see the adventures of Claire Randall portrayed in the flesh, they were also understandably nervous about whether or not the adaptation would do their favorite book justice. It was a long road from the publication of Diana Gabaldon's romantic sci-fi historical book Outlander in 1991 to its first onscreen incarnation in 2014.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |